- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-174/19: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — Vincenti v EUIPO (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Promotion exercises 2014 to 2017 — Decision not to promote the applicant to the AST 8 grade — Right to be heard)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0174
62019TA0174
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 399/31
(Case T-174/19) (*)
(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - Promotion exercises 2014 to 2017 - Decision not to promote the applicant to the AST 8 grade - Right to be heard)
(2020/C 399/44)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Guillaume Vincenti (Alicante, Spain) (represented by H. Tettenborn, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by A. Lukošiūtė and K. Tóth, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision of EUIPO of 6 June 2018 not to promote the applicant to the AST 8 grade in the 2014 to 2017 promotion exercises.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decisions of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 6 June 2018 not to promote Mr Guillaume Vincenti to the AST 8 grade in the 2014 to 2017 promotion exercises;
2.Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2020:399
* * *
(*) Language of the case: German.