EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-737/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2023 — Ryanair v Commission (airBaltic; COVID-19) (State aid — Latvian air transport market — Aid granted by Latvia to airBaltic in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic — Recapitalisation — Decision not to raise any objections — Action for annulment — Locus standi — Admissibility — Temporary Framework for State aid measures — Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State — Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition — Identification of the relevant market — Significant market power — Equal treatment — Freedom of establishment — Freedom to provide services — Obligation to state reasons)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0737

62020TA0737

January 1, 2020
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/1136

4.12.2023

(Case T-737/20) (*)

(State aid - Latvian air transport market - Aid granted by Latvia to airBaltic in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic - Recapitalisation - Decision not to raise any objections - Action for annulment - Locus standi - Admissibility - Temporary Framework for State aid measures - Measure intended to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of a Member State - Failure to weigh the beneficial effects of the aid against its adverse effects on trading conditions and the maintenance of undistorted competition - Identification of the relevant market - Significant market power - Equal treatment - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Obligation to state reasons)

(C/2023/1136)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ryanair DAC (Swords, Ireland) (represented by: E. Vahida, F.-C. Laprévote, V. Blanc, S. Rating, I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis and D. Pérez de Lamo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, C. Georgieva and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendants: Republic of Latvia (represented by K. Pommere and J. Davidoviča, acting as Agents), Air Baltic Corporation AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by J. Ysewyn, lawyer)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of Commission Decision C (2020) 4665 final of 3 July 2020 on State aid SA.56943 (2020/N) — Latvia — COVID-19: Recapitalisation of airBaltic.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action.

2.Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and Air Baltic Corporation AS.

3.Orders the Republic of Latvia to bear its own costs.

(*) Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1136/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia