I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-294/15) (*)
(State aid - Aid granted by certain provisions of the amended German law on renewable energy sources - Annulment of the act criticised by the Court - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 295/41)
Language of the case: German
Applicants: ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH, successor in title to ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH (Duisburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Janssen, et G.–R. Engel, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: R. Sauer, and subsequently by: T. Maxian Rusche and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)
Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1585 of 25 November 2014 on the aid scheme SA.33995 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (implemented by Germany for the support of renewable electricity and of energy-intensive users) (OJ 2015 L 250, p. 122).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the case.
2.The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by ArcelorMittal Hochfeld GmbH, successor in title to ArcelorMittal Ruhrort GmbH.
(*) Language of the case: German.
* * *
(1) OJ C 302, 14.9.2015.