- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-678/16 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 January 2018 — Monster Energy Company v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (Appeal — Rules of Procedure — Article 181 — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘HotoGo self-heating can technology’ — Composite mark — Application for registration — Opposition — Rejection — Appeal manifestly inadmissible)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016CB0678
62016CB0678
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
5.3.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 83/8
(Case C-678/16 P)
((Appeal - Rules of Procedure - Article 181 - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘HotoGo self-heating can technology’ - Composite mark - Application for registration - Opposition - Rejection - Appeal manifestly inadmissible))
(2018/C 083/11)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Monster Energy Company (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Monster Energy Company shall pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 144, 8.5.2017.