I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2023/C 189/54)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Fractal Analytics, Inc. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: J. Güell Serra, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Fractalia Remote Systems, SL (Madrid, Spain)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark FRACTALIA — European Union trade mark No 3 620 887
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 January 2023 in Case R 859/2022-2
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 in connection with Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council, read in conjunction with Article 19(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
—Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of Article 10(3) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625.