I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-34/08)(1)
(Financial assistance paid in the context of the Daphné II program - Determination of the amount to be paid to the beneficiary - Erroneous assessment)
2011/C 319/21
Language of the case: German
Applicant: Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: initially, B. Hening, then U. Claus and, finally, S. Reichmann and L.-J. Schmidt, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, S. Grünheid and B. Simon, then S. Grünheid and F. Dintilhac, Agents)
Application for the annulment of the Commission's decision of 16 November 2007 concerning the Commission's partial non-recognition of the costs incurred by the applicant in the context of Daphné Grant Agreement JAI/DAP/2004-2/052/W.
The Court:
1.Annuls the Commission's decision of 16 November 2007 concerning its partial non-recognition of the costs incurred by Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung eV in the context of Daphné Grant Agreement JAI/DAP/2004-2/052/W in so far as concerns the expenses relating to items A6, A39, A40, A41, A43 and E41;
2.Orders Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung to bear two thirds of its own costs and two thirds of the costs incurred by the European Commission. The Commission shall bear a third of its own costs and a third of the costs incurred by Berliner Institut für Vergleichende Sozialforschung.
(1)
OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.