- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-18/15: Action brought on 2 February 2015 — ZZ and Others v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015FN0018
62015FN0018
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.3.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 96/28
(Case F-18/15)
(2015/C 096/36)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: ZZ and Others (represented by: T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Subject-matter and description of the proceedings
Annulment of the decisions to change the description of the type of post held by the applicants in the Sysper 2 application and/or not to include them in the list of officials proposed for promotion to grades AD 13 and AD 14 in the context of the promotion round for 2014.
Form of order sought
The applicants claim, primarily, that the Tribunal should:
—declare Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, Annex I thereto and the corresponding transitional measures to be unlawful;
—annul the decision of the appointing authority of 14 April 2014 to amend the applicants’ promotion files in the ‘Sysper 2’ system in order to block any possibility of their promotion;
—annul the subsequent decision of the appointing authority, notified on 24 June 2014, not to include the applicants in the list of officials proposed for promotion to grades AD 13 and AD 14 in the context of the annual promotion round for 2014 provided for in Article 45 of the Staff Regulations;
—order the Commission to pay the costs.
In the alternative, the applicants claim that the Tribunal should:
—annul the decision of the appointing authority of 14 April 2014 to amend the applicants’ promotion files in the ‘Sysper 2’ system in order to block any possibility of their promotion;
—annul the subsequent decision of the appointing authority, notified on 24 June 2014, not to include the applicants in the list of officials proposed for promotion to grades AD 13 and AD 14 in the context of the annual promotion round for 2014 provided for in Article 45 of the Staff Regulations;
—order the Commission to pay the costs.