I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-380/18) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark INTAS - Earlier EU and national figurative trade marks including the word element ‘indas’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs and of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Proof of genuine use of the earlier marks - Article 47 of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2019/C 432/48)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd (Ahmedabad, India) (represented by: F. Traub, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Laboratorios Indas, SA (Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain) (represented by: A. Gómez López, lawyer)
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 April 2018 (Case R 815/2017-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Indas and Intas Pharmaceuticals.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
ECLI:EU:C:2019:140