- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-489/12: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2013 — Planet v Commission (Arbitration clause — Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration — Contracts relating to Ontogov, FIT and RACWeb projects — Eligible costs — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissible)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TB0489
62012TB0489
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.11.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 336/24
(Case T-489/12)(1)
(Arbitration clause - Sixth framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration - Contracts relating to Ontogov, FIT and RACWeb projects - Eligible costs - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissible)
2013/C 336/51
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion (Athens, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and B. Conte, agents, and by S. Drakakakis, lawyer)
Re:
Action based on Article 272 TFEU and the first paragraph of Article 340 TFEU seeking a declaration that, first, the refusal by the Commission to allow as eligible costs certain sums paid in advance of completion of the contracts ‘Ontology enabled E-Gov Service Configuration (ONTOGOV)’, ‘Fostering self-adaptive e-government service improvement using semantic technologies (FIT)’ and ‘Risk Assessment for Customs in Western Balkans (RACWeb)’, concluded as part of the Sixth framework programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002-2006), is an infringement by the Commission of its contractual obligations and, secondly, that those sums are eligible costs and ought not to be repaid.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.
2.Planet AE Anonymi Etaireia Parochis Symvouleftikon Ypiresion shall pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 26, 26.1.2013.