- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-269/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 30 May 2014 — Kansaneläkelaitos, Suomen Palvelutaksit ry, Oulun Taksipalvelut Oy
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0269
62014CN0269
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.8.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 261/15
(Case C-269/14)
2014/C 261/22
Language of the case: Finnish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: Kansaneläkelaitos, Suomen Palvelutaksit ry, Oulun Taksipalvelut Oy
Other parties: Suomen Taksiliitto ry, Turun Seudun Invataksit ry, Hämeen Taksi Oy, Itä-Suomen Maakunnallinen Taksi Oy, Kainuun Taksivälitys Oy, Keski-Suomen Taksi Oy, Lounais-Suomen Taxidata Oy, Pohjois-Suomen Taksi Oy
Questions referred
1)Must the case-law of the Court of Justice concerning a service concession be understood as meaning that it does not extend to a complex arrangement which includes the payment of reimbursements within the authority’s organisational responsibility in the form of a direct reimbursement scheme and at the same time a system of booking journeys which is not within the authority’s responsibility?
2)What significance should be attached to the indirect consequence of the scheme that the purpose of the booking system is to reduce the transport costs payable from public funds by the Kansaneläkelaitos?