EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-534/22 P: Appeal brought on 10 August 2022 by Roberto Aquino against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 1 June 2022 in Case T-253/21, Aquino v Parliament

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0534

62022CN0534

August 10, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

24.10.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/33

(Case C-534/22 P)

(2022/C 408/44)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Roberto Aquino (represented by: L. Levi, S. Rodrigues, avocats)

Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

set aside the judgment under appeal;

take a decision itself on the case, resulting in a ruling that the action at first instance is well founded;

order the defendant to pay all the costs of both sets of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

1.Error of law due to an erroneous interpretation of the criterion of doubt entitling the administration to intervene in the electoral process to elect the Bureau of the Staff Committee — Contradictory reasoning — Infringement of the right to freedom of association and assembly (Article 12 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) as reflected in the prohibition of any unjustified interference by the administration in that electoral process.

2.Incorrect classification of certain documents drawn up at the request of the defendant for the purposes of reviewing the electoral process — Breach by the Court of its obligation to state reasons.

3.Distortion of the file and erroneous interpretation of the rules applicable to the constituent meeting of the Staff Committee — Infringement of the rights of the defence.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia