- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-241/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Secția penală și de minori (Romania) lodged on 25 May 2015 — Criminal proceedings against Niculaie Aurel Bob-Dogi
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015CN0241
62015CN0241
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.7.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 245/12
(Case C-241/15)
(2015/C 245/15)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Party to the main proceedings
Questions referred
1)For the purposes of the application of Article 8(1)(c) of the Framework Decision [2002/584/JHA] (1), must the expression ‘the existence of an ... arrest warrant’ be understood to refer to a national — domestic — arrest warrant issued in accordance with the criminal procedural rules of the issuing Member State, and therefore distinct from the European arrest warrant?
2)If the first question is answered in the affirmative, may the non-existence of a national — domestic — arrest warrant constitute an implied reason for non-execution of the European arrest warrant?
Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).