- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-326/09: Action brought on 10 August 2009 — E v Parliament
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0326
62009TN0326
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.10.2009
Official Journal of the European Union
C 256/32
(Case T-326/09)
2009/C 256/56
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: E (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament
Form of order sought
—annul the decision adopted by the Bureau of the Parliament of 9 March and 3 April 2009 amending the Additional Voluntary Pension Scheme for Members of the European Parliament;
—order the Parliament to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
By the present action, the applicant seeks annulment of the decisions of the Bureau of the European Parliament of 9 March and 3 April 2009 amending the rules on the Additional (Voluntary) Pension Scheme in Annex VIII of the Rules governing the payment of expenses and allowances to Members of the European Parliament. The amendments essentially concern the withdrawal of the possibility to take early retirement from age 50 and the possibility to receive the pension as a lump sum, and the raising of the retirement age from 60 to 63 years.
The pleas in law and main arguments invoked by the applicant are, in essence, identical or similar to those invoked in the context of Case T-219/09 Balfe and Others v Parliament (1).
(1) OJ 2009 C 205, p. 39.