I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2016/C 175/34)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Claranet Europe Ltd (St Helier, Jersey) (represented by: G. Crown and D. Farnsworth, Solicitors)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Claro SA (São Paulo, Brazil)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark in red ‘claranet’ — Application for registration No 11 265 113
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 January 2016 in Case R 803/2015-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO (and if applicable, any intervener) to bear its own and pay the applicant’s costs.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.