- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-60/19: Order of the General Court of 9 March 2020 — Republic of Cyprus v EUIPO — Filotas Bellas & Yios (Halloumi Vermion) (EU trade mark — Cancellation of the trade mark on which the application for a declaration of invalidity is based — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0060
62019TB0060
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.6.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 191/13
(Case T-60/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Cancellation of the trade mark on which the application for a declaration of invalidity is based - No need to adjudicate)
(2020/C 191/17)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz QC and V. Marsland, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Filotas Bellas & Yios AE (Alexandreia, Greece)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 November 2018 (Case R 2296/2017-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between the Republic of Cyprus and Filotas Bellas & Yios.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.The Republic of Cyprus shall bear the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
* * *
(1) OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.