- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-846/19: Order of the General Court of 10 June 2020 — Golden Omega v Commission (Action for annulment — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff nomenclature — Classification in the Combined Nomenclature — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0846
62019TB0846
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.8.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 287/33
(Case T-846/19) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff nomenclature - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)
(2020/C 287/52)
Language of the case: Dutch
Parties
Applicant: Golden Omega, SA (Santiago, Chili) (represented by: S. Moolenaar, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: W. Roels and M. Salyková, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1661 of 24 September 2019 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2019 L 251, p. 1).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Golden Omega, SA is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 61, 24.2.2020.
* Language of the case: Dutch
ECLI:EU:C:2020:140