I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Joined Cases T-159/13 and T-372/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Iran with a view to preventing nuclear proliferation - Freezing of funds - Actions for annulment - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Point from which time starts to run - Admissibility - Right to be heard - Obligation to notify - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of defence - Manifest error of assessment))
(2016/C 027/34)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: HK Intertrade Co. Ltd (Wanchai, Hong Kong, China) (represented by: J. Grayston, Solicitor, P. Gjørtler, G. Pandey, D. Rovetta, N. Pilkington and D. Sellers, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: V. Piessevaux and M. Bishop, acting as Agents)
Application, in Case T 159/13, for annulment of Council Decision 2012/829/CFSP of 21 December 2012 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 356, p. 71) and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1264/2012 of 21 December 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 267/2012 concerning restrictive measures against Iran (OJ 2012 L 356, p. 55), and, in Case T 372/14, for annulment of the Council decision contained in the letter of 14 March 2014 concerning the maintenance of the restrictive measures adopted in respect of the applicant.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the actions;
2.Orders HK Intertrade Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 147, 25.5.2013.