- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-21/19: Action brought on 11 January 2019 — Pablosky v EUIPO — docPrice (mediFLEX easystep)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TN0021
62019TN0021
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
4.3.2019
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 82/64
(Case T-21/19)
(2019/C 82/76)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Pablosky, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A. Tarí Lázaro, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: docPrice GmbH (Koblenz, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark mediFLEX easystep — Application for registration No 15 730 898
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 November 2018 in Case R 76/2018-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—reverse the contested decision;
—reject the EUTM No 15 730 898 in its entirety as regards products included in classes 10 and 25;
—award the costs to the applicant.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.