EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-102/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 27 April 2023 — HC v European Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Recruitment — Open competition EPSO/AD/363/18 — Notice of competition — Assessment by the selection board of the candidate’s answers to the ‘Talent Screener’ — Non-admission to the next stage of the competition — Rules on languages — Limitation of the choice of the second language of the competition to English and French — Plea of illegality relating to the notice of competition — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0102

62022CA0102

April 27, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

12.6.2023

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/14

(Case C-102/22 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Appeal - Civil service - Recruitment - Open competition EPSO/AD/363/18 - Notice of competition - Assessment by the selection board of the candidate’s answers to the ‘Talent Screener’ - Non-admission to the next stage of the competition - Rules on languages - Limitation of the choice of the second language of the competition to English and French - Plea of illegality relating to the notice of competition - Inadmissibility)

(2023/C 205/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: HC (represented by: D. Rovetta and V. Villante, avvocati)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Brauhoff and T. Lilamand, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal.

2.Orders HC to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 222, 7.6.2022.

Language of the case: English

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia