- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-518/18: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 — YG v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2017 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 9 — Comparison of the merits — Equal treatment — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TA0518
62018TA0518
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.7.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 230/24
(Case T-518/18) (*)
(Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2017 promotion procedure - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 9 - Comparison of the merits - Equal treatment - Manifest error of assessment - Duty to state reasons)
(2020/C 230/29)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: YG (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Champetier, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid, B. Eggers and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 13 November 2017 not to promote the applicant in the 2017 promotion procedure.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.
(*)
Language of the case: English.
OJ C 399, 5.11.2018