EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-706/22: Action brought on 16 November 2022 — Nicoventures Trading and Others v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0706

62022TN0706

November 16, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/46

(Case T-706/22)

(2023/C 15/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Nicoventures Trading Ltd (London, United Kingdom) and 5 other applicants (represented by: L. Van den Hende, M. Schonberg, J. Penz-Evren and P. Wytinck, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

order the annulment of the contested measure (1) in its entirety; and

order that the defendant pay the applicants’ costs in these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the contested measure goes beyond the powers delegated to the Commission under Articles 7(12) and 11(6) of Directive 2014/40/EU (2), for the following four reasons:

by regulating a novel tobacco product, the contested measure unlawfully addresses an ‘essential element’ within the meaning of Article 290(1) TFEU;

the contested measure unlawfully introduces a new ‘particular product category’ for the purposes of Directive 2014/40/EU and thereby also infringes the general EU law principles of legal certainty and legitimate expectations;

The contested measure introduces a new ‘particular product category’ that is inconsistent with the system of Directive 2014/40/EU, and is consequently unlawful; and

The Commission’s approach to assessing the existence of a ‘substantial change of circumstances’ exceeds the scope of the task conferred upon it.

2.Second plea in law, alleging failure to state reasons as required by Article 296 TFEU and infringement of the principle of good administration.

* Language of the case: English.

Commission’s Delegated Directive (EU) 2022/2100 of 29 June 2022 amending Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the withdrawal of certain exemptions in respect of heated tobacco products (OJ 2022, L 283, p. 4).

Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC (OJ 2014, L 127, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia