- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-303/21: Action brought on 31 May 2021 — FC v EASO
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0303
62021TN0303
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.7.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 289/46
(Case T-303/21)
(2021/C 289/62)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: FC (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)
Defendant: European Asylum Support Office (EASO)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul the contested measure rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 26 March 2021 under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union; and
—order the defendant to pay the entirety of the costs incurred by the applicant.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law:
The contested measure is vitiated by a breach of the principle of procedural economy and by an infringement of the applicant’s right to effective judicial protection, on the following grounds:
1.infringement of the applicant’s right of defence, since the defendant continues not to connect the disciplinary proceedings with errors and infringements of fundamental rights committed by the defendant at the earlier stage — that is to say, at the pre-disciplinary stage — which also produce effects at the subsequent stage of the disciplinary proceedings; and
2.infringement of the applicant’s right to be heard.