- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-182/16: Action brought on 22 April 2016 — L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot (MASTER DUO)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0182
62016TN0182
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 222/28
(Case T-182/16)
(2016/C 222/35)
Language in which the application was lodged: French
Parties
Applicant: L’Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Guinot SAS (Paris, France)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MASTER DUO’ — Application for registration No 11 577 574
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2016 in Case R 2916/2014-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) read in conjunction with Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.