I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Commercial policy - Dumping - Imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye - Definitive anti-dumping duties - Constructed normal value - Product control number - Article 2(3), (5) and (6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 - Comparison between the normal value and the export price - Article 2(10) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Currency conversion - Injury to the Union industry - Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Sampling - Article 17(1) of Regulation 2016/1036 - Manifest error of assessment - Error of law)
(C/2025/3889)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Hitit Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Istanbul, Türkiye) (represented by: A. Willems and B. Natens, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, R. Pethke and J. Zieliński, acting as Agents)
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/265 of 9 February 2023 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of ceramic tiles originating in India and Türkiye (OJ 2023 L 41, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the applicant.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Hitit Seramik Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ to pay the costs.
—
(1) OJ C 223, 26.6.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3889/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—