- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-557/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 22 September 2017 — Y.Z. and Others, Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017CN0557
62017CN0557
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.11.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 402/17
(Case C-557/17)
(2017/C 402/20)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellants: Y.Z., Z.Z. and Y.Y., Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie
Questions referred
1.Must Article 16(2)(a) of Council Directive 2003/86/EC (1) of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification … be interpreted as precluding the withdrawal of a residence permit granted for the purpose of family reunification in the case where the acquisition of that residence permit was based on fraudulent information but the family member was unaware of the fraudulent nature of that information?
2.Must Article 9(1)(a) of Council Directive 2003/109/EC (2) of 25 November 2003 concerning the status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents … be interpreted as precluding the withdrawal of long-term resident status in the case where the acquisition of that status was based on fraudulent information but the long-term resident was unaware of the fraudulent nature of that information?
(1) OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12.
(2) OJ 2004 L 16, p. 44.