- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-137/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Dresden (Germany) lodged on 22 February 2018 — hapeg dresden gmbh v Bayrische Straße 6-8 GmbH & Co. KG
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0137
62018CN0137
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-137/18)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: hapeg dresden gmbh
Defendant: Bayrische Straße 6-8 GmbH & Co. KG
Question referred
Is EU law, in particular Article 15(3)(b) and (c) and the first, second and third sentences of Article 16(1)(b) and (c) of Directive 2006/123/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 (‘the Services Directive’) to be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that applicable in the main proceedings, which prohibits the agreement in contracts with architects and/or engineers of a fee that is lower than the minimum fee resulting from the Honorarordnung für Architekten und Ingenieure (Rules on Fees and Emoluments for Architects and Engineers)?
(1) Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market (OJ 2006 L 376, p. 36).
* * *
Language of the case: German.