I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-118/12 P) (<a id="ntc1-C_2013108EN.01000901-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2013108EN.01000901-E0001"> (<span class="super">1</span>)</a>)
(Appeal - Directives 67/548/EEC and 2004/73/EC - Classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances - Classification of n-propyl-bromide)
2013/C 108/17
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Enviro Tech Europe Ltd (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, avocats)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Oliver and E. Manhaeve, Agents), Enviro Tech International Inc.
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 16 December 2011 in Case T-291/04 Enviro Tech Europe Ltd and Enviro Tech International, Inc. v European Commission by which the General Court dismissed an action for (i) annulment in part of Commission Directive 2004/73/EC of 29 April 2004 adapting to technical progress for the twenty-ninth time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (OJ 2004 L 152, p. 1), in so far as it classifies n-propyl-bromide as a ‘highly flammable’ substance, and for (ii) damages for the loss which the applicants claim they had sustained — Legal interest in bringing proceedings — Lack of individual concern
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Enviro Tech Europe Ltd is ordered to pay the costs.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2013108EN.01000901-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2013108EN.01000901-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ C 227, 28.7.2012).