EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-422/09: Action brought on 19 October 2009 — São Paulo Alpargatas v OHIM — Fischer (BAHANIAS LAS ORIGINALES)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0422

62009TN0422

January 1, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

5.12.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/33

(Case T-422/09)

2009/C 297/51

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: São Paulo Alpargatas, SA (represented by: P. Merino Baylos, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Enrique Fischer

Form of order sought

uphold the application and annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 August 2009, with all the appropriate consequences under Community law;

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Enrique Fischer

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the verbal component “BAHIANAS (LAS ORIGINALES)” (Application No 5 024 591) for goods in class 25.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community figurative mark containing the verbal component “havaianas” (No 3 772 431), Spanish figurative mark containing the verbal component “havaianas” (M 2 341 904) and Spanish word mark “HAVAIANAS” (M 2 341 905), all for goods in class 25.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Refusal of the application for a Community mark in its entirety.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the contested decision.

Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia