- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-209/19: Order of the General Court of 5 September 2019 — Giorgio Armani v EUIPO — Invicta Watch Company of America (GLYCINE) (European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Withdrawal of the application for registration – No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0209
62019TB0209
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.10.2019
Official Journal of the European Union
C 363/16
(Case T-209/19) (*)
(European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)
(2019/C 363/23)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Giorgio Armani SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: J. Rether and M. Kinkeldey, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Invicta Watch Company of America, Inc. (Hollywood, Florida, United States)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2019 (Case R 578/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Giorgio Armani and Invicta Watch Company of America, Inc.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Giorgio Armani SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.