- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-89/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 1 December 2010 — Gagalis v Council (Civil service — Social security — Occupational accident — Partial permanent invalidity — Decision to take responsibility for 75 % of the costs of a thermal cure — Reimbursement for care under Article 72 of the Staff Regulations and additional reimbursement under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Exclusion of cover for subsistence expenses — Refusal of additional reimbursement — Interpretation of Article 73(3) of the Staff Regulations and of Article 9 of the Common rules on the insurance of officials against the risk of accident and occupational disease)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009FA0089
62009FA0089
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.1.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 30/62
(Case F-89/09) (<span class="super">1</span>)
(Civil service - Social security - Occupational accident - Partial permanent invalidity - Decision to take responsibility for 75 % of the costs of a thermal cure - Reimbursement for care under Article 72 of the Staff Regulations and additional reimbursement under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Exclusion of cover for subsistence expenses - Refusal of additional reimbursement - Interpretation of Article 73(3) of the Staff Regulations and of Article 9 of the Common rules on the insurance of officials against the risk of accident and occupational disease)
2011/C 30/119
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Spyridon Gagalis (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer, then by N. Lhoëst and L. Delhaye, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and K. Zieleśkiewicz, Agents)
Re:
Action for annulment of the defendant’s decision refusing to reimburse the applicant, pursuant to Article 73 of the Staff Regulations, 75 % of all the costs relating to a thermal cure.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Gagalis to pay all the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 312, 19.12.2009, p. 45.
Language of the case: French