- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-347/16: Order of the General Court of 21 June 2017 — Inox Mare v Commission (Action for annulment — Customs Union — Commission decision finding that the repayment of import duties is not justified in a particular case — Action brought by a separate operator — No direct concern — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TB0347
62016TB0347
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.8.2017
Official Journal of the European Union
C 269/22
(Case T-347/16)(Action for annulment - Customs Union - Commission decision finding that the repayment of import duties is not justified in a particular case - Action brought by a separate operator - No direct concern - Inadmissibility)
(2017/C 269/31)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: Inox Mare Srl (Rimini, Italy) (represented by: R. Holzeisen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros, J. Baquero Cruz and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 9672 final of 6 January 2016 finding that the repayment of import duties is not justified in a particular case (REM 02/14).
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.Inox Mare Srl shall bear its own costs and also pay those incurred by the European Commission.
*
Language of the case: Italian.
(1) OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.