- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 11 July 2007. # Mülhens GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community trade mark TOSKA LEATHER - Earlier national word mark TOSCA - Relative grounds for refusal - Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94. # Case T-28/04.
ECLI:EU:T:2007:213
62004TJ0028
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-28/04)
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for figurative Community trade mark TOSKA LEATHER – Earlier national word mark TOSCA – Relative grounds for refusal – Well-known trade mark within the meaning of Article 6 bis of the Paris Convention – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 – Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 November 2003 (Case R 10/2003-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Mülhens GmbH & Co. KG and Mirco Cara.
Information relating to the case
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Mirco Cara
Community trade mark sought:
Figurative mark TOSKA LEATHER for goods in Classes 16, 18 and 25 – Application No 1079888
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
German word mark TOSCA for perfumery products
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition allowed for products in Class 25 and dismissed as to the remainder
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
Operative part
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders Mülhens GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.