- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-472/21, Monz Handelsgesellschaft International: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 February 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Monz Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co. KG v Büchel GmbH & Co. Fahrzeugtechnik KG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Intellectual property — Design — Directive 98/71/EC — Article 3(3) and (4) — Conditions for obtaining protection for a component part of a complex product — Concepts of ‘visibility’ and ‘normal use’ — Visibility of a component part of a complex product during normal use of that product by the end user)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0472
62021CA0472
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.4.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 127/8
(Case C-472/21, (1) Monz Handelsgesellschaft International)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual property - Design - Directive 98/71/EC - Article 3(3) and (4) - Conditions for obtaining protection for a component part of a complex product - Concepts of ‘visibility’ and ‘normal use’ - Visibility of a component part of a complex product during normal use of that product by the end user)
(2023/C 127/09)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant: Monz Handelsgesellschaft International mbH & Co. KG
Respondent: Büchel GmbH & Co. Fahrzeugtechnik KG
Operative part of the judgment
Article 3(3) and (4) of Directive 98/71/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs
must be interpreted as meaning that the requirement of ‘visibility’, laid down in that provision, that is to be met in order for a design applied to or incorporated in a product which constitutes a component part of a complex product to be eligible to benefit from the legal protection of designs, must be assessed in the light of a situation of normal use of that complex product, so that the component part concerned, once it has been incorporated into that product, remains visible during such use. To that end, the visibility of a component part of a complex product during its ‘normal use’ by the end user must be assessed from the perspective of that user as well as from the perspective of an external observer, and that normal use must cover acts performed during the principal use of a complex product as well as acts which must customarily be carried out by the end user in connection with such use, with the exception of maintenance, servicing and repair work.
(1) OJ C 471, 22.11.2021.