I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2018/C 112/59)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Visi/one GmbH (Remscheid, Germany) (represented by: H. Bourree and M. Bartz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: EasyFix GmbH (Vienna, Austria)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Applicant
Design at issue: Community design No 1391114-0001
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2017 in Case R 1424/2016-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order the intervener to pay the costs, including those incurred in the course of the appeals procedure.
—Infringement of the second sentence of Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of the first sentence of Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002.