I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2023/C 252/72)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Mushie & Co. (Houston, Texas, United States) (represented by: S. Vasegård, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Diana Dolls Fashions Inc. (Stoney Creek, Canada)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark Mushie — Application for registration No 18 381 490
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 March 2023 in Case R 2062/2022-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
—Infringement of Article 120(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.