- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-592/22: Action brought on 22 September 2022 — Liquid Advertising v EUIPO — Liqui.do (Liquid+Arcade)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0592
62022TN0592
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.11.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 424/51
(Case T-592/22)
(2022/C 424/64)
Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
Parties
Applicant: Liquid Advertising, Inc. (El Segundo, California, United States) (represented by: M. Czarnecki, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Liqui.do SA (Lisbon, Portugal)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Liquid+Arcade’ — Application No 18 317 971
Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 June 2022 in Case R 2231/2021-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul, in their entirety, the contested decision and the decision of EUIPO’s Opposition Division of 12 November 2021 or, in the alternative, amend the contested decision by upholding the appeal lodged by the applicant;
—make an appropriate order as to costs in the applicant’s favour.
Plea in law
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.