- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-441/12: Action brought on 5 October 2012 — Trenzas y Cables de Acero v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TN0441
62012TN0441
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 373/12
(Case T-441/12)
2012/C 373/20
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Trenzas y Cables de Acero PSC, SL (Santander, Spain) (represented by: F. González Díaz and P. Herrero Prieto, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the General Court should:
—annul, pursuant to Article 264 TFEU, the decision of the European Commission of 25 July 2012 in Case COMP/38.344 — prestressing steel;
—require the Commission to provide, in accordance with Article 24 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 64(3)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, the documents, calculations and other matters of law and/or fact that served as the basis to grant the requests for inability to pay of Proderac, CB, ITAS, OriMartin and Siderúrgica Latina Martin and/or to accept the reduction in the fine of AreclorMittal;
—in any event, order the European Commission to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and the main arguments are the same as those raised in Case T-438/12 Global Steel Wire v Commission.