- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-201/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 17 April 2013 — Johan Deckmyn, Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Others
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0201
62013CN0201
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.6.2013
Official Journal of the European Union
C 189/6
(Case C-201/13)
2013/C 189/11
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Johan Deckmyn, Vrijheidsfonds VZW
Defendants: Helena Vandersteen, Christiane Vandersteen, Liliana Vandersteen, Isabelle Vandersteen, Rita Dupont, Amoras II CVOH, WPG Uitgevers België
Questions referred
1.Is the concept of ‘parody’ an independent concept in European Union law?
2.If so, must a parody satisfy the following conditions or conform to the following characteristics:
—the display of an original character of its own (originality);
—and such that the parody cannot reasonably be ascribed to the author of the original work;
—be designed to provoke humour or to mock, regardless of whether any criticism thereby expressed applies to the original work or to something or someone else;
—mention the source of the parodied work?
3.Must a work satisfy any other conditions or conform to other characteristics in order to be capable of being labelled as a parody?