- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-186/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 25 March 2021 — Republic of Slovenia
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CN0186
62021CN0186
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
31.5.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 206/20
(Case C-186/21)
(2021/C 206/25)
Language of the case: Slovenian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: J. A.
Defendant: Republic of Slovenia
Questions referred
1.Must Article 8(3)(d) of the Reception Directive II (1) be construed as meaning that the term ‘including’ expressly includes, among the objective criteria, the fact that ‘[the person concerned has] already had the opportunity to access the asylum procedure’?
2.If the answer to that question is in the negative, must Article 8(3)(d) of the Reception Directive II be construed as meaning that, in the circumstances set out above, detention is permissible only on the basis of predetermined objective criteria and of a prior finding that the applicant for international protection has already had the opportunity to lodge an application for international protection, so that it can be concluded that there are reasonable grounds to believe that that application was made merely in order to delay or frustrate the enforcement of a return decision?
Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast) (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 96).