- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-595/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 25 November 2011 — Steinel Vertrieb GmbH v Hauptzollamt Bielefeld
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011CN0595
62011CN0595
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.3.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 89/2
(Case C-595/11)
2012/C 89/03
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Steinel Vertrieb GmbH
Defendant: Hauptzollamt Bielefeld
Question referred
Are
(a)Council Regulation (EC) No 1470/2001 (1) of 16 July 2001 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) originating in the People’s Republic of China
and
(b)Council Regulation (EC) No 1205/2007 (2) of 15 October 2007 imposing anti-dumping duties on imports of integrated electronic compact fluorescent lamps (CFL-i) originating in the People’s Republic of China following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 and extending to imports of the same product consigned from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Republic of the Philippines to be interpreted as meaning that they also cover the compact fluorescent lamps with a twilight switch imported by the claimant and described in greater detail in the order?
(1) OJ 2001 L 195, p. 8, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1322/2006 of 1 September 2006 (OJ 2006 L 244, p. 1).
(2) OJ 2007 L 272, p. 1.