I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-408/09)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark ‘ancotel’ - Earlier Community figurative mark ‘ACOTEL’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Relevant public)
2011/C 204/37
Language of the case: German
Applicant: ancotel GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: H. Truelsen, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Acotel SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented initially by D. De Simone and D. Demarinis, lawyers, and subsequently by D. De Simone, D. Demarinis and J. Wrede, lawyers)
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 June 2009 (Case R 1385/2008-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Acotel SpA and ancotel GmbH.
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 19 June 2009 (Case R 1385/2008-1);
2.Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by ancotel GmbH;
3.Orders Acotel SpA to bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 312, 19.12.2009.