- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-369/21: Action brought on 30 June 2021 — Unimax Stationery v EUIPO — Mitsubishi Pencil (uni)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0369
62021TN0369
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.8.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 338/27
(Case T-369/21)
(2021/C 338/35)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Unimax Stationery (Daman, India) (represented by: E. Amoah, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mitsubishi Pencil Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark uni — European Union trade mark No 6 920 615
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 April 2021 in Case R 1909/2020-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(b) and (d) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council .