EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-545/12: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2013 — Mory and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Traditional and express couriers — Decision not to extend the obligation of repayment to the potential purchasers of the beneficiary in composition with creditors — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62012TB0545

62012TB0545

November 11, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

18.1.2014

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/16

(Case T-545/12) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Action for annulment - State aid - Traditional and express couriers - Decision not to extend the obligation of repayment to the potential purchasers of the beneficiary in composition with creditors - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)

2014/C 15/23

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Mory SA (Pantin, France); Mory Team (Pantin); Superga Invest, formerly Compagnie française superga d’investissement dans le service (CFSIS) (Miraumont, France) (represented by: B. Vatiert and F. Loubières, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 2401 final of 4 April 2012, concerning the takeover of assets of the Sernam group as part of its composition with creditors.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.There is no need to adjudicate on the applications of the French Republic and Calberson to intervene.

3.Mory SA, Mory Team and Superga Invest shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

4.The French Republic and Calberson, applicants for leave to intervene, shall bear their own costs.

Language of the case: French.

* * *

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia