- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-620/20: Action brought on 5 October 2020 — Alessio and Others v ECB
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0620
62020TN0620
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.11.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 390/50
(Case T-620/20)
(2020/C 390/67)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicants: Roberto Alessio (Turin, Italy) and 56 other applicants (represented by: M. Condinanzi and L. Boggio, lawyers)
Defendant: European Central Bank
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul the contested decisions and declare them null and void, after finding them unlawful;
—order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The present action is brought against the decision to dissolve the administrative and supervisory bodies of the supervised entity (Banca Carige S.p.A.) and to replace them with three temporary administrators and a supervisory committee for the purposes of Articles 69-octiesdecies, 70 and 98 of Legislative Decree No 385 of 1 September 1993 — ECB-SSM-2019-ITCAR-11 of 1 January 2019, and against the decision extending the special administration of the supervised entity approved by ECB decision ECB-SSM-2019-ITCAR-11 on the basis of Articles 69-octiesdecies, 70 and 98 of Legislative Decree No 385 of 1 September 1993 — ECB-SSM-2019-ITCAR-13, as well as against subsequent measures resulting therefrom and, in particular, decisions extending the special administration of the supervised entity.
The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those raised in Case T-612/20, Malacalza Investimenti v ECB.