- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-374/21: Order of the General Court of 6 May 2022 — documentus Deutschland v EUIPO — Reisswolf (REISSWOLF) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0374
62021TB0374
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
25.7.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 284/34
(Case T-374/21) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate)
(2022/C 284/45)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: documentus Deutschland GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: D. Weller, V. Wolf, A. Wulff and K. Schmidt-Hern, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Reisswolf Akten- und Datenvernichtung GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg) (represented by: A. Ebert-Weidenfeller and H. Förster, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 March 2021 (Case R 2354/2019-1), concerning invalidity proceedings between documentus Deutschland and Reisswolf Akten- und Datenvernichtung.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
2.documentus Deutschland GmbH and Reisswolf Akten- und Datenvernichtung GmbH & Co. KG shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
(*) Language of the case: German.
* * *
(1) OJ C 329, 16.8.2021