- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-235/21: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 29 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče — Slovenia) — Raiffeisen Leasing, trgovina in leasing d.o.o. v Republika Slovenija (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common system of value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 203 — Sale-and-lease back agreement — Persons liable for payment of VAT — Possibility of treating a written contractual agreement as an invoice)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0235
62021CA0235
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.11.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 432/5
(Case C-235/21)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 203 - Sale-and-lease back agreement - Persons liable for payment of VAT - Possibility of treating a written contractual agreement as an invoice)
(2022/C 432/06)
Language of the case: Slovenian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Raiffeisen Leasing, trgovina in leasing d.o.o.
Defendant: Republika Slovenija
Operative part of the judgment
Article 203 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006, on the common system of value added tax,
must be interpreted as meaning that:
a contractual sale-and-lease back agreement, the conclusion of which was not followed by the issue of an invoice by the parties, may be regarded as an invoice, within the meaning of that provision, where that contractual agreement contains all the information necessary for the tax authorities of a Member State to be able to establish whether the substantive conditions for the right to deduct value added tax are satisfied in the case, which is for the referring court to ascertain.
(1)
OJ C 217, 7.6.2021.