EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-567/11: Action brought on 31 October 2011 — Viejo Valle v OHIM — Etablissements Coquet (Soup-plate with grooves)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0567

62011TN0567

October 31, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

4.2.2012

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/27

(Case T-567/11)

2012/C 32/56

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Viejo Valle, SA (L'Olleria, Spain) (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Etablissements Coquet SA (Saint Léonard de Noblat, France)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

declare the present action, together with its annexes, admissible;

annul the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 July 2011, in Case R 1055/2010-3;

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Design in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Design No 384.912-0009, representing a decorated service set; a soup-plate.

Proprietor of the Community design: the applicant.

Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Etablissements Coquet SA.

Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Infringement of Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002, since the Community design constitutes an unauthorised use of a work protected by the copyright legislation of a Member State.

Decision of the Cancellation Division: upheld the application for a declaration of invalidity.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissed the action.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 and Article 28(1)(b)(iii) of Regulation No 2245/2002, since the defendant has not sufficiently documented the protected work on which the application for a declaration of invalidity is based, nor provided details of its proprietorship, nor its object.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia