- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-747/20: Action brought on 18 December 2020 — EOC Belgium v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TN0747
62020TN0747
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.2.2021
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 53/56
(Case T-747/20)
(2021/C 53/72)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: EOC Belgium (Oudenaarde, Belgium) (represented by: Y. Melin, and B. Vigneron, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Article 1(4) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1336 of 25 September 2020 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain polyvinyl alcohols originating in the People’s Republic of China in accordance with Article 263 TFEU, in that the European Commission infringed Article 9(5) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union, by imposing an anti-dumping duty in a discriminatory manner by granting an exemption on the basis of the end-use customs regime;
—order the European Commission and any parties intervening in support of the Commission to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, which is, essentially, identical or similar to the plea raised in Case T-746/20, Grünig v Commission.