I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2011/C 340/52
Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
Applicant: Natura Selection SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ernest Menard SA (Bourseul, France)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—admit the present application;
—require OHIM to produce in these proceedings the evidence of reputation to which the applicant referred during the appeal procedure in Case R 2454/2010-2 and which is identified in paragraph 39 of the application;
—annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 June 2011 in Case R 2454/2010-2 and the decision of the Opposition Division of 21 October 2010 in Case B 1072513;
—grant full registration to figurative mark No 4 713 368‘natura’, refused by opposition B 1072513 for goods in Class 20;
—order OHIM to pay all the costs of the proceedings.
Applicant for a Community trade mark: Natura Selection
Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘natura’ for goods and services in Classes 14, 20, 25 and 35.
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Ernest Menard SA.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark ‘natura’ for goods and services in Classes 19 and 20.
Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.
Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, given that there is no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks at issue.
*
Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).