EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-461/11: Action brought on 22 August 2011 — Natura Selection v OHIM — Menard (natura)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0461

62011TN0461

August 22, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

19.11.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/25

(Case T-461/11)

2011/C 340/52

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Natura Selection SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ernest Menard SA (Bourseul, France)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

admit the present application;

require OHIM to produce in these proceedings the evidence of reputation to which the applicant referred during the appeal procedure in Case R 2454/2010-2 and which is identified in paragraph 39 of the application;

annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 June 2011 in Case R 2454/2010-2 and the decision of the Opposition Division of 21 October 2010 in Case B 1072513;

grant full registration to figurative mark No 4 713 368‘natura’, refused by opposition B 1072513 for goods in Class 20;

order OHIM to pay all the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for a Community trade mark: Natura Selection

Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘natura’ for goods and services in Classes 14, 20, 25 and 35.

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Ernest Menard SA.

Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark ‘natura’ for goods and services in Classes 19 and 20.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed.

Pleas in law: infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009, given that there is no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks at issue.

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark (OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1).

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia