I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2023/C 71/51)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Light Tec Ltd (Tsuen Wan, Hong Kong, China) (represented by: M.-H. Hoffmann)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DecoTrend GmbH (Weiden, Germany)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: EU design lampshades / EU design No 4031201-0004
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2022 in Case R 2105/2021-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision and EU design No 4031201-0004;
—order EUIPO and the other party in the proceedings to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before EUIPO.
—Infringement of Article 63(1) of Council Directive (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of Article 63(2) of Council Directive (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of the obligation to state reasons;
—Infringement of Article 60(2) of Council Directive (EC) No 6/2002;
—Infringement of the right to be heard.